We have journeyed through the dark underbelly of sanctuary cities in this series, exposing them as the insidious root cause of America’s immigration crisis. These policies, born from misguided activism in the 1980s and nurtured by decades of bipartisan negligence, have morphed into a monster that attracts illegal crossings, overloads public resources, fuels violent crime waves, supercharges drug epidemics, and enables the horrific exploitation of human trafficking. They have turned our cities into law-free zones where cartels thrive, migrants suffer, and American citizens bear the unbearable costs—economic, social, and human. The Orwellian doublespeak that reframes criminality as compassion has only prolonged the madness, while modern battles in places like New Hampshire and New York City highlight the ongoing pushback. But enough diagnosis; it is time for the cure.
In this final installment, I will outline a comprehensive roadmap to dismantle sanctuary cities and fix our broken immigration system. We will start with practical steps: defunding these jurisdictions at the federal level, rigorously enforcing the overlooked laws from 1996, and proposing bipartisan reform bills that can bridge the partisan divide. Then, we will get creative in countering the key enemies—both within our borders, like George Soros and other billionaire puppeteers funding the radical left’s agenda; and without, including China’s insidious role in fentanyl production through Mexican cartels and its broader hegemonic maneuvers across the Western Hemisphere, Europe, and Africa.
We will also address the persistent threat from Iran, should its mullah regime weather the current revolts, and the broader Islamic networks that fund non-assimilating sects, such as the Somali communities in Minnesota, who exploit American generosity while Democrat politicians, enriched by questionable means, parrot unified scripts. Figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Bernie Sanders, and Nancy Pelosi exemplify this corruption, arriving in Washington with modest means only to amass fortunes through insider advantages. By weaving these threads together, we will see that ending the sanctuary madness requires not just policy tweaks but a full-throated defense of American values against those who seek to undermine them from afar and from within.
Defunding Sanctuaries: Cutting Off the Lifeblood
The first and most immediate solution is to defund sanctuary cities at the federal level, starving them of the resources that allow their defiance to persist. This is not a radical idea; it is grounded in existing law. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1373, part of the Immigration and Nationality Act, local governments are explicitly prohibited from restricting their employees from sharing information about immigration status with federal authorities like ICE. Yet, hundreds of jurisdictions flout this, creating pockets of immunity that attract criminals and exploiters. The Trump administration’s approach in early 2026 provides a blueprint: Starting February 1, executive actions have begun withholding billions in federal grants from non-compliant cities like New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles. For New York City alone, this could mean losing over $8 billion in funding that has been squandered on migrant housing, education, and healthcare since 2023, forcing a reckoning with the true costs of their policies. Expanding this defunding strategy would involve a multi-pronged assault.
Congress could pass legislation to bar all forms of federal aid—not just Justice Department grants, but also allocations from Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and Health and Human Services (HHS)—to any jurisdiction that maintains sanctuary status. Bills like H.R. 32, the No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act, already propose redirecting those funds to border security and victim compensation programs, ensuring that taxpayer dollars support enforcement rather than evasion. States can join the fight too; Texas and Florida have led by suing the federal government for reimbursement of immigration-related costs and passing their own laws to penalize local sanctuaries. Every State with a Republican Governor and state legislature should immediately declare all sanctuary jurisdictions in the state illegal! Imagine if every red state followed suit, creating a patchwork of accountability that pressures blue strongholds to comply. The result would be cash-strapped cities like Chicago, where Mayor Brandon Johnson has already begun wavering under the weight of a $1 billion-plus migrant crisis, forced to abandon their defiant stances. Defunding is not punitive; it is a restoration of the rule of law, signaling that no locality can opt out of national security obligations without consequences.
Enforcing 1996 Laws: Reviving Forgotten Tools
Hand in hand with defunding comes the enforcement of laws that have gathered dust for too long. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996 was a landmark piece of legislation designed to close loopholes and strengthen cooperation between local and federal authorities. Section 287(g) of that act allows the Department of Homeland Security to deputize local law enforcement to perform immigration functions, such as identifying and processing deportable aliens in custody. Under the Biden administration, these agreements were slashed dramatically, reducing the program’s effectiveness and allowing criminal aliens to slip through the cracks. Reviving and expanding 287(g) nationwide would empower sheriffs and police departments to work seamlessly with ICE, ensuring that dangerous individuals are not released back into communities to reoffend.
The Justice Department can lead the charge by filing lawsuits against non-compliant jurisdictions, as it did against New York City in 2025, citing violations of federal supremacy under the Constitution. Mandating E-Verify for all employers would further tighten the net, making it impossible for illegal immigrants to secure jobs without proper documentation and drying up the economic incentives for crossing. We could also revisit the 1996 welfare reforms, which barred most immigrants from federal benefits for five years, and extend those restrictions to prevent sanctuary cities from becoming welfare magnets. The proof of concept is already evident in the 2025 deportation surge: Over 670,000 removals and 2 million self-deportations have correlated with a 17% drop in violent crime nationwide, demonstrating that when laws are enforced, safety follows. By breathing new life into these 1996 provisions, we can close the loopholes that have allowed sanctuaries to thrive, restoring a system where immigration serves America, not undermines it.
Bipartisan Reform Bills: Building Bridges for Lasting Change
While defunding and enforcement provide quick wins, long-term solutions require bipartisan legislation to overhaul the system. The key is crafting bills that appeal across the aisle: Combine strict enforcement with humane pathways for legal immigrants. One idea is reviving elements of the Secure America’s Future Act (SAFE Act), which proposes funding for border walls, advanced technology like drones and sensors, and limits on asylum claims to prevent abuse. Pair this with reforms to end chain migration, restricting family-based visas to immediate spouses and minor children, which would reduce the pull factor for extended networks. A merit-based points system, modeled after Canada’s successful approach, could prioritize skilled workers, entrepreneurs, and those with English proficiency, ensuring immigrants contribute economically from day one.
To win Democratic support, include worker protections: Raise minimum wages in high-immigration sectors like agriculture and construction and offer a path to citizenship for long-term, law-abiding residents who pass background checks. But the word “amnesty” should not be anywhere near such a bill. Such a bill could pass via budget reconciliation if needed, bypassing filibusters, or through regular order with compromises on DACA-like protections for childhood arrivals. This will a tricky one since DACA in its original form essentially turned into amnesty – so Republicans must be very careful how it crafts this bill. The goal is a comprehensive package that seals borders, enforces interior laws, and reforms visas—ending the madness by addressing root causes like cartel exploitation and economic incentives. Historical precedents, like the 1986 Reagan amnesty paired failed miserably because to coin the often-used phrase – “give them an inch, they take a mile”.
Countering Enemies Within: The Billionaire Cabal
To truly end the sanctuary madness, we must creatively confront the enemies within—billionaires who fund the Democrat party’s radical left agenda, perpetuating open borders and cultural erosion. George Soros is the poster child, pouring over $300 million through vehicles like the Sixteen Thirty Fund into 2024 elections, backing progressive prosecutors and sanctuary advocates who prioritize identity politics over public safety. But he is not alone; Tom Steyer has funneled $200 million-plus into climate and immigration causes, often aligning with open-border groups that view sanctuaries as environmental justice. Mike Bloomberg’s $100 million+ investments in gun control and urban policy extend to supporting mayors who double down on non-cooperation, framing it as community trust-building. Laurene Powell Jobs, with $50 million+ to Dreamer funds and media outlets, promotes narratives that romanticize illegal immigration while ignoring its harms.
And “Dreamers” are not just illegal immigrant children that want a better future, it might be a good time to recognize that children of legal citizens have “Dreams” too – and those dreams include safe schools and a bright future as well! And it is in the failed State-run public schools that also need massive reform that have been taken over by far-left radicals funded by these oligarchs who care more about increasing their power and influence rather than improving the lives of school children.
These oligarchs buy influence, ensuring Democrats speak in lockstep on issues like sanctuaries because they are, quite literally, paid to do so. Counterstrategies must be multifaceted: Push for campaign finance reforms that cap billionaire donations and require full transparency for dark money groups. Launch congressional hearings to expose these networks, as the 2025 House Oversight Committee did with Soros’ ties to anti-Israel protests. Antitrust actions could break up media conglomerates amplified by these funds, reducing biased coverage that shields radical policies. Grassroots efforts—boycotts of companies tied to these billionaires—can apply economic pressure, while state laws banning foreign-influenced funding in elections add layers of defense. By shining a light on this cabal, we disrupt the financial pipelines sustaining sanctuary defiance.
It is quite evident that corrupt politicians from both parties can easily be bought – and at some point, the big money that funds these politicians must be eliminated. Like the fact that Congress had no problem passing the 22nd amendment to limit terms of the President – they somehow have not gotten around to proposing an amendment to limit the terms of Congress. It may be that a convention of States to propose and ratify term limits and limit the influence of oligarch’s big money in politics will be the only way to limit the influence of big donors – whether domestic billionaires or foreign governments that undermine the best interests of America by promoting Sanctuary Cities and violent protests. China, Mexico, Iran, and other oil rich Islamist anti-American countries come to mind.
Enemies Without: China’s Global Gambit
Turning outward, China’s role demands equally creative countermeasures. Beijing funds fentanyl precursors shipped to Mexican cartels, enabling a chemical assault that killed 48,000 Americans in 2025 alone. This is not accidental; it is strategic warfare, weakening the U.S. from within while China expands globally. In Greenland, Chinese firms eye rare earth minerals under the guise of research stations, threatening U.S. Arctic security. Panama’s canal sees Beijing’s port investments, potentially controlling trade chokepoints. Venezuela’s $518 billion trade ties and $9 billion credits prop up Maduro, creating anti-U.S. footholds. Across the Western Hemisphere, Belt and Road initiatives debt-trap nations, from Ecuador to Argentina.
China’s strategy extends to AI and minerals: Dominating 60% of rare earth mining and 91% of processing, they choke global supply chains. In AI, Beijing’s 2027 governance plan aims for world leadership, investing billions in surveillance tech exported to authoritarians. In Africa, China builds infrastructure for cobalt and lithium access; in Europe, investments in ports and tech firms erode independence. Counter: Impose tariffs on Chinese chemicals, ally with India for alternative precursors. Strengthen alliances like QUAD for Indo-Pacific minerals, ban Chinese AI in U.S. systems. Trump’s policies in Venezuela, Greenland and Panama seem to be on the right path. The raid and capture on the criminal Cartel Narco-terrorist Maduro was as striking win – but the danger lies in a reversal if a far-left Democrat wins the presidency in 2028 and undoes everything positive Trump is doing, and the US oil companies are hindered from capitalizing on the new free Venezuela. And if China is again allowed to seize ports in Panama and have a monopoly control or rare mineral rights – with a retreat from Greenland – this would send us back on the path of decline from growing sanctuary cities.
Iran and the Islamic Threat
Iran’s mullahs, if surviving 2026 revolts fueled by economic woes and women’s rights protests, pose existential threats not just to America but the world: Accelerated nukes, ballistic missiles targeting allies, and proxy terror via Hezbollah in Latin America. Surviving regimes could export revolution, funding Shia militias in Venezuela or Argentina. Broader Islamic threats include funding non-assimilating sects like Somalis in Minnesota, where $9 billion fraud potentially aids al-Shabaab. These groups exploit sanctuaries and welfare, rejecting American freedoms for sharia-like enclaves, burdening taxpayers while Democrats enable for votes.
Counter: Arm Iran dissidents covertly, sanction regime elites
For Islamic networks, mandate assimilation programs—English classes, civics tests—for immigrants; cut welfare for non-citizens, enforce vetting against terror ties. International coalitions dismantle funding streams, as Trump’s 2025 designations did for cartels.
Bought Democrats: Enrichment Tales
This corruption manifests in Democrats’ enrichment: AOC’s net worth soared 200% from $29,000 in 2019 to millions via book deals and speeches. Sanders went from $500,000 to $3 million on royalties. Pelosi’s $120 million+ stems from husband Paul’s trades, often timed suspiciously with legislation. And the latest hot off the press are the revelations of Omar’s wealth from debt and about $15k in income in 2020 to over $15,000,000 in 2024 and accusation that it is closer to $40 million or more today! These aren’t coincidences; they’re symptoms of a system where influence peddling thrives, funded by the very billionaires pushing radical agendas.
Conclusion: A Bold Roadmap Forward
Ending sanctuary madness requires defunding, enforcement, reforms—and vigilant countermeasures against internal billionaires and external foes like China and Iran. By exposing and disrupting these forces, we reclaim our nation.
Part 10: Sanctuary Solutions – Ending the Madness
We have journeyed through the dark underbelly of sanctuary cities in this series, exposing them as the insidious root cause of America’s immigration crisis. These policies, born from misguided activism in the 1980s and nurtured by decades of bipartisan negligence, have morphed into a monster that attracts illegal crossings, overloads public resources, fuels violent crime waves, supercharges drug epidemics, and enables the horrific exploitation of human trafficking. They have turned our cities into law-free zones where cartels thrive, migrants suffer, and American citizens bear the unbearable costs—economic, social, and human. The Orwellian doublespeak that reframes criminality as compassion has only prolonged the madness, while modern battles in places like New Hampshire and New York City highlight the ongoing pushback. But enough diagnosis; it is time for the cure.
In this final installment, I will outline a comprehensive roadmap to dismantle sanctuary cities and fix our broken immigration system. We will start with practical steps: defunding these jurisdictions at the federal level, rigorously enforcing the overlooked laws from 1996, and proposing bipartisan reform bills that can bridge the partisan divide. Then, we will get creative in countering the key enemies—both within our borders, like George Soros and other billionaire puppeteers funding the radical left’s agenda; and without, including China’s insidious role in fentanyl production through Mexican cartels and its broader hegemonic maneuvers across the Western Hemisphere, Europe, and Africa.
We will also address the persistent threat from Iran, should its mullah regime weather the current revolts, and the broader Islamic networks that fund non-assimilating sects, such as the Somali communities in Minnesota, who exploit American generosity while Democrat politicians, enriched by questionable means, parrot unified scripts. Figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilan Omar, Bernie Sanders, and Nancy Pelosi exemplify this corruption, arriving in Washington with modest means only to amass fortunes through insider advantages. By weaving these threads together, we will see that ending the sanctuary madness requires not just policy tweaks but a full-throated defense of American values against those who seek to undermine them from afar and from within.
Defunding Sanctuaries: Cutting Off the Lifeblood
The first and most immediate solution is to defund sanctuary cities at the federal level, starving them of the resources that allow their defiance to persist. This is not a radical idea; it is grounded in existing law. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1373, part of the Immigration and Nationality Act, local governments are explicitly prohibited from restricting their employees from sharing information about immigration status with federal authorities like ICE. Yet, hundreds of jurisdictions flout this, creating pockets of immunity that attract criminals and exploiters. The Trump administration’s approach in early 2026 provides a blueprint: Starting February 1, executive actions have begun withholding billions in federal grants from non-compliant cities like New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles. For New York City alone, this could mean losing over $8 billion in funding that has been squandered on migrant housing, education, and healthcare since 2023, forcing a reckoning with the true costs of their policies. Expanding this defunding strategy would involve a multi-pronged assault.
Congress could pass legislation to bar all forms of federal aid—not just Justice Department grants, but also allocations from Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and Health and Human Services (HHS)—to any jurisdiction that maintains sanctuary status. Bills like H.R. 32, the No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act, already propose redirecting those funds to border security and victim compensation programs, ensuring that taxpayer dollars support enforcement rather than evasion. States can join the fight too; Texas and Florida have led by suing the federal government for reimbursement of immigration-related costs and passing their own laws to penalize local sanctuaries. Every State with a Republican Governor and state legislature should immediately declare all sanctuary jurisdictions in the state illegal! Imagine if every red state followed suit, creating a patchwork of accountability that pressures blue strongholds to comply. The result would be cash-strapped cities like Chicago, where Mayor Brandon Johnson has already begun wavering under the weight of a $1 billion-plus migrant crisis, forced to abandon their defiant stances. Defunding is not punitive; it is a restoration of the rule of law, signaling that no locality can opt out of national security obligations without consequences.
Enforcing 1996 Laws: Reviving Forgotten Tools
Hand in hand with defunding comes the enforcement of laws that have gathered dust for too long. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996 was a landmark piece of legislation designed to close loopholes and strengthen cooperation between local and federal authorities. Section 287(g) of that act allows the Department of Homeland Security to deputize local law enforcement to perform immigration functions, such as identifying and processing deportable aliens in custody. Under the Biden administration, these agreements were slashed dramatically, reducing the program’s effectiveness and allowing criminal aliens to slip through the cracks. Reviving and expanding 287(g) nationwide would empower sheriffs and police departments to work seamlessly with ICE, ensuring that dangerous individuals are not released back into communities to reoffend.
The Justice Department can lead the charge by filing lawsuits against non-compliant jurisdictions, as it did against New York City in 2025, citing violations of federal supremacy under the Constitution. Mandating E-Verify for all employers would further tighten the net, making it impossible for illegal immigrants to secure jobs without proper documentation and drying up the economic incentives for crossing. We could also revisit the 1996 welfare reforms, which barred most immigrants from federal benefits for five years, and extend those restrictions to prevent sanctuary cities from becoming welfare magnets. The proof of concept is already evident in the 2025 deportation surge: Over 670,000 removals and 2 million self-deportations have correlated with a 17% drop in violent crime nationwide, demonstrating that when laws are enforced, safety follows. By breathing new life into these 1996 provisions, we can close the loopholes that have allowed sanctuaries to thrive, restoring a system where immigration serves America, not undermines it.
Bipartisan Reform Bills: Building Bridges for Lasting Change
While defunding and enforcement provide quick wins, long-term solutions require bipartisan legislation to overhaul the system. The key is crafting bills that appeal across the aisle: Combine strict enforcement with humane pathways for legal immigrants. One idea is reviving elements of the Secure America’s Future Act (SAFE Act), which proposes funding for border walls, advanced technology like drones and sensors, and limits on asylum claims to prevent abuse. Pair this with reforms to end chain migration, restricting family-based visas to immediate spouses and minor children, which would reduce the pull factor for extended networks. A merit-based points system, modeled after Canada’s successful approach, could prioritize skilled workers, entrepreneurs, and those with English proficiency, ensuring immigrants contribute economically from day one.
To win Democratic support, include worker protections: Raise minimum wages in high-immigration sectors like agriculture and construction and offer a path to citizenship for long-term, law-abiding residents who pass background checks. But the word “amnesty” should not be anywhere near such a bill. Such a bill could pass via budget reconciliation if needed, bypassing filibusters, or through regular order with compromises on DACA-like protections for childhood arrivals. This will a tricky one since DACA in its original form essentially turned into amnesty – so Republicans must be very careful how it crafts this bill. The goal is a comprehensive package that seals borders, enforces interior laws, and reforms visas—ending the madness by addressing root causes like cartel exploitation and economic incentives. Historical precedents, like the 1986 Reagan amnesty paired failed miserably because to coin the often-used phrase – “give them an inch, they take a mile”.
Countering Enemies Within: The Billionaire Cabal
To truly end the sanctuary madness, we must creatively confront the enemies within—billionaires who fund the Democrat party’s radical left agenda, perpetuating open borders and cultural erosion. George Soros is the poster child, pouring over $300 million through vehicles like the Sixteen Thirty Fund into 2024 elections, backing progressive prosecutors and sanctuary advocates who prioritize identity politics over public safety. But he is not alone; Tom Steyer has funneled $200 million-plus into climate and immigration causes, often aligning with open-border groups that view sanctuaries as environmental justice. Mike Bloomberg’s $100 million+ investments in gun control and urban policy extend to supporting mayors who double down on non-cooperation, framing it as community trust-building. Laurene Powell Jobs, with $50 million+ to Dreamer funds and media outlets, promotes narratives that romanticize illegal immigration while ignoring its harms.
And “Dreamers” are not just illegal immigrant children that want a better future, it might be a good time to recognize that children of legal citizens have “Dreams” too – and those dreams include safe schools and a bright future as well! And it is in the failed State-run public schools that also need massive reform that have been taken over by far-left radicals funded by these oligarchs who care more about increasing their power and influence rather than improving the lives of school children.
These oligarchs buy influence, ensuring Democrats speak in lockstep on issues like sanctuaries because they are, quite literally, paid to do so. Counterstrategies must be multifaceted: Push for campaign finance reforms that cap billionaire donations and require full transparency for dark money groups. Launch congressional hearings to expose these networks, as the 2025 House Oversight Committee did with Soros’ ties to anti-Israel protests. Antitrust actions could break up media conglomerates amplified by these funds, reducing biased coverage that shields radical policies. Grassroots efforts—boycotts of companies tied to these billionaires—can apply economic pressure, while state laws banning foreign-influenced funding in elections add layers of defense. By shining a light on this cabal, we disrupt the financial pipelines sustaining sanctuary defiance.
It is quite evident that corrupt politicians from both parties can easily be bought – and at some point, the big money that funds these politicians must be eliminated. Like the fact that Congress had no problem passing the 22nd amendment to limit terms of the President – they somehow have not gotten around to proposing an amendment to limit the terms of Congress. It may be that a convention of States to propose and ratify term limits and limit the influence of oligarch’s big money in politics will be the only way to limit the influence of big donors – whether domestic billionaires or foreign governments that undermine the best interests of America by promoting Sanctuary Cities and violent protests. China, Mexico, Iran, and other oil rich Islamist anti-American countries come to mind.
Enemies Without: China’s Global Gambit
Turning outward, China’s role demands equally creative countermeasures. Beijing funds fentanyl precursors shipped to Mexican cartels, enabling a chemical assault that killed 48,000 Americans in 2025 alone. This is not accidental; it is strategic warfare, weakening the U.S. from within while China expands globally. In Greenland, Chinese firms eye rare earth minerals under the guise of research stations, threatening U.S. Arctic security. Panama’s canal sees Beijing’s port investments, potentially controlling trade chokepoints. Venezuela’s $518 billion trade ties and $9 billion credits prop up Maduro, creating anti-U.S. footholds. Across the Western Hemisphere, Belt and Road initiatives debt-trap nations, from Ecuador to Argentina.
China’s strategy extends to AI and minerals: Dominating 60% of rare earth mining and 91% of processing, they choke global supply chains. In AI, Beijing’s 2027 governance plan aims for world leadership, investing billions in surveillance tech exported to authoritarians. In Africa, China builds infrastructure for cobalt and lithium access; in Europe, investments in ports and tech firms erode independence. Counter: Impose tariffs on Chinese chemicals, ally with India for alternative precursors. Strengthen alliances like QUAD for Indo-Pacific minerals, ban Chinese AI in U.S. systems. Trump’s policies in Venezuela, Greenland and Panama seem to be on the right path. The raid and capture on the criminal Cartel Narco-terrorist Maduro was as striking win – but the danger lies in a reversal if a far-left Democrat wins the presidency in 2028 and undoes everything positive Trump is doing, and the US oil companies are hindered from capitalizing on the new free Venezuela. And if China is again allowed to seize ports in Panama and have a monopoly control or rare mineral rights – with a retreat from Greenland – this would send us back on the path of decline from growing sanctuary cities.
Iran and the Islamic Threat
Iran’s mullahs, if surviving 2026 revolts fueled by economic woes and women’s rights protests, pose existential threats not just to America but the world: Accelerated nukes, ballistic missiles targeting allies, and proxy terror via Hezbollah in Latin America. Surviving regimes could export revolution, funding Shia militias in Venezuela or Argentina. Broader Islamic threats include funding non-assimilating sects like Somalis in Minnesota, where $9 billion fraud potentially aids al-Shabaab. These groups exploit sanctuaries and welfare, rejecting American freedoms for sharia-like enclaves, burdening taxpayers while Democrats enable for votes.
Counter: Arm Iran dissidents covertly, sanction regime elites
For Islamic networks, mandate assimilation programs—English classes, civics tests—for immigrants; cut welfare for non-citizens, enforce vetting against terror ties. International coalitions dismantle funding streams, as Trump’s 2025 designations did for cartels.
Bought Democrats: Enrichment Tales
This corruption manifests in Democrats’ enrichment: AOC’s net worth soared 200% from $29,000 in 2019 to millions via book deals and speeches. Sanders went from $500,000 to $3 million on royalties. Pelosi’s $120 million+ stems from husband Paul’s trades, often timed suspiciously with legislation. And the latest hot off the press are the revelations of Omar’s wealth from debt and about $15k in income in 2020 to over $15,000,000 in 2024 and accusation that it is closer to $40 million or more today! These aren’t coincidences; they’re symptoms of a system where influence peddling thrives, funded by the very billionaires pushing radical agendas.
Conclusion: A Bold Roadmap Forward
Ending sanctuary madness requires defunding, enforcement, reforms—and vigilant countermeasures against internal billionaires and external foes like China and Iran. By exposing and disrupting these forces, we reclaim our nation.